Brand Failures: Analyzing What Went Wrong

No brand is immune to failure, no matter how successful or renowned that’s why you need services from Themarketingheaven.com. While strong brands carefully cultivate their image, positioning, and customer loyalty, even the biggest names have made missteps that damaged their reputation or, in some cases, led to their downfall. Analyzing these brand failures offers valuable lessons in the importance of understanding market trends, customer needs, and maintaining brand integrity. Let’s look at some notable brand failures, exploring what went wrong and how similar pitfalls can be avoided.
1. Kodak: Failing to Embrace Digital Transformation

Kodak was once synonymous with photography, holding a dominant market position throughout the 20th century. However, as digital photography emerged, Kodak’s reluctance to embrace change led to its downfall. Ironically, Kodak even invented the first digital camera but feared that digital photography would undermine its film business, so the company failed to capitalize on it.
What Went Wrong:

Resistance to Change: Kodak held onto its legacy products instead of investing in digital technology, believing that film would continue to drive profits.
Ignoring Market Shifts: As consumers quickly transitioned to digital cameras and later smartphones, Kodak lost relevance.
Missed Opportunities: By not leveraging its digital camera technology, Kodak missed out on the burgeoning digital market.

Lesson: Brands must adapt to market shifts and technological advancements to remain relevant. Embracing innovation—even at the risk of disrupting core products—is often essential for long-term success.
2. New Coke: Misreading Customer Loyalty

In the 1980s, Coca-Cola made a bold move by launching “New Coke” in response to competition from Pepsi. The new formula was intended to revitalize the brand and win over a younger audience. However, it led to massive backlash, as loyal customers felt alienated, and Coca-Cola had to bring back its original formula under “Coca-Cola Classic.”
What Went Wrong:

Ignoring Brand Loyalty: Coca-Cola underestimated the emotional connection customers had with the original formula.
Inadequate Market Research: While focus groups indicated some preference for the new formula, Coca-Cola failed to account for the backlash that would come from changing a beloved product.
Overestimating the Need for Change: Coca-Cola assumed it needed a drastic change to compete, but customers were actually satisfied with the original product.

Lesson: Before making drastic changes, brands need to understand customer loyalty and sentiment. Change isn’t always necessary, and when it is, gradual adjustments can be better than radical overhauls.
3. Blockbuster: Underestimating the Streaming Revolution

Blockbuster dominated the video rental market for decades but was slow to adapt to the shift to online streaming. Netflix, once a small DVD-by-mail service, quickly seized the opportunity to transition to digital streaming, while Blockbuster dismissed it as a niche trend. By the time Blockbuster attempted to pivot, it was too late.
What Went Wrong:

Dismissal of Emerging Competitors: Blockbuster didn’t view Netflix as a serious competitor and failed to recognize the convenience and appeal of streaming.
Slow Digital Adoption: Blockbuster’s late attempt to transition to streaming was a half-hearted effort that couldn’t compete with Netflix’s established digital infrastructure.
Over-Reliance on Legacy Model: Blockbuster remained attached to its retail store model, not realizing the extent of the digital shift until it was too late.

Lesson: Brands must stay agile and proactive in recognizing disruptive technologies and competitors. Ignoring innovation can lead to obsolescence.
4. Pepsi’s Kendall Jenner Ad: Misjudging Social Sensitivities

Pepsi’s 2017 ad featuring Kendall Jenner attempted to tap into social justice themes by depicting a protest where a can of Pepsi seemingly resolves tensions. However, the ad was criticized for trivializing serious social issues, leading to a PR disaster and swift removal of the campaign.
What Went Wrong:

Tone-Deaf Messaging: The ad oversimplified complex social issues, creating the perception that Pepsi was out of touch with the reality of social justice movements.
Lack of Authenticity: The campaign came across as insincere, using activism as a marketing ploy rather than engaging meaningfully with the issues.
Insufficient Audience Research: The brand failed to gauge how the ad’s message would resonate with its audience, underestimating the sensitivity of social issues.

Lesson: Brands need to be careful when addressing social issues, ensuring that campaigns are authentic and respectful. Missteps in this area can lead to backlash and damage brand trust.
5. J.C. Penney: Misguided Rebranding and Pricing Strategy

In an effort to revitalize the brand, J.C. Penney hired Apple executive Ron Johnson, who introduced a new pricing strategy, moving away from discounts to a “fair and square” pricing model. However, customers were accustomed to frequent sales, and the abrupt shift caused confusion and alienated loyal shoppers.
What Went Wrong:

Misunderstanding the Customer Base: J.C. Penney’s customers valued sales and discounts, and the brand’s pivot away from this model failed to appeal to its core audience.
Failure to Test Changes Gradually: Johnson implemented sweeping changes without testing them in smaller markets, which led to a rapid and negative response.
Alienating Loyal Customers: The new strategy alienated loyal customers while failing to attract new ones, resulting in declining sales and negative publicity.

Lesson: Knowing your customer base is crucial when considering major changes. Testing new strategies incrementally can also help mitigate risks and assess customer response.
6. Google Glass: Innovation without a Clear Market

Google Glass, launched in 2013, was an innovative attempt to bring wearable tech to mainstream consumers. However, privacy concerns, a high price point, and limited practical applications led to low adoption rates and ultimately, the product’s failure.
What Went Wrong:

Lack of Market Readiness: The product was ahead of its time, and consumers weren’t ready to adopt wearable tech with such intrusive features.
High Price Point: The price was prohibitively high, limiting the device’s accessibility and appeal to a broader audience.
Privacy Concerns: The device’s ability to discreetly record others led to public backlash and privacy concerns, making people uncomfortable with its use.

Lesson: Launching innovative products requires careful consideration of market readiness, pricing, and consumer sentiment. Aligning product design with consumer needs is essential for success.
Conclusion: Key Lessons from Brand Failures

Analyzing these brand failures reveals common themes and lessons that can help other brands avoid similar pitfalls.

Stay Agile and Embrace Innovation: Brands like Kodak and Blockbuster show that adapting to technological changes is critical to staying relevant. Ignoring innovation can lead to irrelevance.

Listen to Your Customers: New Coke and J.C. Penney’s failures underscore the importance of understanding and respecting customer preferences. Alienating loyal customers can have lasting repercussions.

Consider the Social Climate: Pepsi’s misstep highlights the importance of carefully addressing social issues in marketing. Brands must ensure campaigns align authentically with social values and are respectful of sensitive issues.

Understand Market Readiness: As with Google Glass, even the most innovative products need a receptive market. Properly assessing consumer needs and concerns can mean the difference between success and failure.

Adapt with Caution: Change is necessary for growth, but brands should test strategies incrementally rather than implementing drastic changes all at once.

Learning from these missteps can offer brands the insights needed to build campaigns that resonate, adopt changes that meet customer expectations, and leverage innovation without compromising brand integrity. In a fast-evolving market, remaining adaptable, customer-centric, and authentic is key to staying ahead.

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 9.8/10 (4 votes cast)

Download – Office 2013 Quick Start Guides

Here are some handy quick start guides for those new to Office 2013:

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)

Skype is Missing Windows Messenger Contacts

Since the forced upgrade from Windows Live Messenger to Skype the number one complaint we’ve seen is pretty consistent:

“All of my Windows Messenger contacts are gone in Skype 6.3.”

This happens even when the previous WLM user is signing into Skype with their Microsoft Account (Windows Live) credentials.

The “Service Status” page has not been much help https://status.live.com/ and the thread on the Skype Forum is (at last count) over 316 replies and growing.

Here’s the workaround I’ve been using.

Confirm these items:

  1. Remote into the users workstation to confirm that they are using Microsoft Account credentials to log into Skype (and not a Skype ID).
  2. Go to this URL and login using the same Microsoft Account credentials to see if you get an error message.
    https://people.live.com

If the people.live.com site gives an error, try this fix:

  1. Close all Internet browser windows.
  2. Login to this URL using the users Microsoft Account credentials.
    https://account.live.com
  3. Once successfully logged in, copy and paste this URL into the same browser window (not on a new tab).
    https://profile.live.com/P.mvc#!/cid-ec65c6b13776fbb6/invites
  4. Once that page loads, try opening https://people.live.com again.
    You should no longer get an error and you should also see a graphic in the top right-hand side of the webpage that says you’re connected to SKYPE.
    Connected to Skype message
  5. On the users PC log out of Skype, then log back in again with their Microsoft Account. Hopefully they will see all of their Windows Live Messenger contacts again.

That’s worked for me, so I hope it helps you.

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Video – Windows Phone 8 Commercial

Recently Microsoft has upped their game with decent commercials. This commercial below takes aim at the iPhone vs Samsung phone debate, and it’s hilarious.

 

Don’t fight. Switch to the Nokia Lumia 920 Windows Phone
VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Voting – May 2013 KYSBSUG Meeting

KYSBSUG LogoThere are some really cool features in Windows Server 2012, almost too many to choose from.

We’d like the group to vote on which topic YOU would like to see presented at the next KYSBSUG meeting in May 2013 in Louisville, Kentucky USA.

Here are the topics:

  • Hyper-V Replica
  • Hyper-V Over SMB
  • Hyper-V Shared Nothing Live Migration
  • Windows Server 2012 Storage Spaces

If you would like to attend this meeting in person in May 2013, please cast your vote via this quick survey (no login or email address required):
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/RP9MYPF

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Favorite Tech – Pelican Micro Case 1020

I’ve been working lately to try and streamline the tools and methods I use, and I’ve even been fine-tuning the transport of that equipment.

One thing I’ve adopted lately (that I can’t live without) are various sizes of hard plastic water-proof / crush-proof cases made by Pelican Products. Here is one of my favorites:

Pelican Micro Case 1020
http://www.pelican.com/cases_detail.php?Case=1020

There are a plethora of Pelican Micro Cases, and the odd sizes can make it a bit overwhelming (or trial-and-error) to find the right size case. The 1020 Micro Case is the perfect size for 2.5” portable hard drives. It has a rubberized insert in the bottom and a clear lid so you can see what’s inside.

Pelican Micro Case 1020

The drive shown in this picture is a Western Digital 1TB 2.5” USB 2 drive.

Something to note – the Pelican Micro Cases are a bit tall, so they won’t fit that easily in a hard-sided bag. However, if you carry your laptop around in a backpack, this is the perfect way to add some protection.

I’ll highlight some other favorite tech things on the blog, and you’re welcome to share your ideas and tools too!

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 10.0/10 (2 votes cast)

Microsoft MVPv6

I got a nice email from Microsoft on Tue Jan 1, 2013:

Microsoft MVP Award - 2013

Dear Tim Barrett,

Congratulations! We are pleased to present you with the 2013 Microsoft® MVP Award! This award is given to exceptional technical community leaders who actively share their high quality, real world expertise with others. We appreciate your outstanding contributions in Small Business Server technical communities during the past year.

The Microsoft MVP Award provides us the unique opportunity to celebrate and honor your significant contributions and say "Thank you for your technical leadership."

Mike Hickman
Director
Community Engagement
Microsoft

This marks my sixth year receiving the MVP Award (2008-2013) and I certainly don’t deserve it (just ask Rob Pearman, he can vouch for that ;-). 

Thanks Microsoft! And a special thanks goes to Michelle Campbell, my MVP Lead! I really look forward to 2013 – it should be quite an interesting year.

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 10.0/10 (2 votes cast)

Download – Free Explore SharePoint 2013 eBook

eBook - Explore SharePoint 2013Title: Explore Microsoft SharePoint 2013
Author: Microsoft Office System and Servers Team
Publisher: Microsoft Corporation
Published: 10/23/2012
Pages: 81
File size: PDF (1.2 MB) also in .EPUB, .MOBI & .DOC
Price: FREE
Download URL: Click here to download

Description:
This book provides information about what’s new in SharePoint 2013. The audiences for this book include application specialists, line-of-business application specialists, and IT administrators who want to know more about SharePoint 2013. (duh)

Also, if that first link in the PDF doesn’t work, here’s the URL to access the SharePoint 2013 Technical Library on TechNet:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc303422(office.15).aspx 

Prop: Thanks to Robert Crane for the heads-up

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 6.0/10 (2 votes cast)

You Must Be THIS Tall to Ride Hyper-V

From the mail bag: The SBS Diva requested that I share my thoughts on SBS consultants who are new to Hyper-V. Thanks go to Susan for the idea to share. Complaints or disagreements about the content go to me.

First, I think we can all agree that there’s a big difference between getting virtualization installed and truly understanding / supporting it. 
 
Hardware Lab

If you want to get your feet wet with Hyper-V, a free e-book like “Understanding Microsoft Virtualization Solutions, 2nd Edition” is a good place to start. But reading only gets you so far. You need hands-on experience.

It’s pretty easy and inexpensive to buy an HP MicroServer, throw 8 GB of RAM and a second NIC in it. Then load up a trial version of Server 2008 R2 or Server 2012. That setup is not powerful, it’s not fast, but the important bits are there to see how it’s done. Other than using a repurposed PC from a client or eBay, I don’t know of a more inexpensive way to setup a hardware-based lab.
 
To Virtualize or Not to Virtualize?

Our first rule of thumb is that if you’re using SBS 2008 or 2011 and no other member servers, you’ll probably be happier on bare metal. Sure, you can install the free Hyper-V server on the bare metal, install a single SBS VM, and install RSAT (Win7 or Win8) on a member PC to manage it. That makes disaster recovery easier from a Hardware Abstraction Layer perspective. But unless you’ve got a brown belt or higher in PowerShell (or a third party tool like vtUtilities) there’s pain-a-plenty for the average SBS installer / consultant who’s green with Hyper-V or Server Core.  Virtualization rights of 1+1 (2008) or 1+2 (2012) are great with the full GUI, but buying a full copy of Windows Server just for the GUI isn’t really a good pricing option for a single SBS install w/ no member servers.
 
Our second rule: If you have SBS + a member server, virtualize it. Period. And that goes for Essentials or Standard.
 
The Minimum You Need to Know

Certification is a baseline, not an indication of “I know everything about this subject” (even if you get a perfect score). Passing Microsoft exam 70-659 is, in my opinion, a bare minimum for a technician to be ‘supporting’ Hyper-V in production at a customer site. Can you install Hyper-V (core or GUI) without passing that exam? Sure. Is there a lot of RDS / VDI / System Center on that exam that you may never use? Probably. But it’s still a good baseline for understanding the long-range implications of the Hyper-V design decisions you make.

When things go sideways with Hyper-V someday (and it will happen), you’re going to need a lot more knowledge than a simple installation whitepaper or a couple of Hyper-V videos on YouTube to get you out of that mess.
 
Exam 70-659 (TS: Windows Server 2008 R2, Server Virtualization)

Resource-wise, for the 70-659 exam Mitch Garvis did a nice set of eLearning with videos for Microsoft Learning (priced at $191.99 US)
https://www.microsoftelearning.com/eLearning/collection.aspx?guid=79CF085B-9EF7-4B35-8752-08161F333908
 
Also, the 70-659 Jump Start with Symon Perriman and Philip Helsel was really good too:
http://mctreadiness.com/MicrosoftCareerConferenceRegistration.aspx?pid=274
 
That stuff is 2008 R2 (as is the exam) but 99% of the servers out there are not Server 2012 yet. If you’re brand new to Hyper-V and you don’t have any virtualized clients yet, skip 2008 R2 and go straight for 2012.
 
Microsoft Certified Solutions Associate (MCSA): Windows Server 2012

For Server 2012 virtualization I HIGHLY recommend the *free* Early Experts content that Microsoft is putting online for the MCSA 2012. (Our SBS user group is going through that material on a weekly basis to prep for those 3 MCSA 2012 exams).
http://earlyexperts.net

The 2012 virtualization videos from TechEd 2012 North America on Channel 9 are also awesome (and free as well).

Social Media

If you want to keep on the cutting edge of Microsoft virtualization, check out Aidan Finn’s blog http://www.aidanfinn.com. Mitch Garvis http://garvis.ca and Philip Elder http://blog.mpecsinc.ca have excellent virtualization content as well.

Update (2012-12-04)

I forgot to add the link for the Microsoft Virtual Academy (also free).
http://www.microsoftvirtualacademy.com/Home.aspx

Bottom Line

Play with Hyper-V (2008 R2 or preferably 2012) ASAP if you haven’t already. And make sure you and your techs honestly know what you’re doing before you put customer data at risk. Hyper-V is your friend. It’s just a friend that you need to get to know first.

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 10.0/10 (3 votes cast)