Video – Windows Server 2012 Essentials

Rick Claus and Cristian Molina from Microsoft talk about Windows Server 2012.

Edge Show 63 - Windows Server 2012 Essentials

Title: Edge Show 63 – Windows Server 2012 Essentials
Run time: 23 minutes 23 seconds
Format: Silverlight

Can’t see the Silverlight video above?

Click the link below to choose another video format or to download offline.

  • MP3
  • MP4
  • WMV

Link: http://channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Edge/Edge-Show-63-Windows-Server-2012-Essentials

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

PowerShell – Move AD FSMO Roles in Server 2012

Over the long weekend we worked on two projects:

  1. Upgrade the Hyper-V hosts on the cluster at the data center
  2. Finish prepping a new Hyper-V host and Domain Controller for a new branch office with a new subnet

imageSince the cluster at the data center holds all of the Active Directory FSMO roles we needed to transfer the roles to an alternate location on the MPLS network so that project 1 didn’t slow down or stop project 2.

PowerShell to the rescue!

WHICH SERVER HOLDS THE FSMO ROLES?

Open PowerShell as an Administrator and type:

netdom query fsmo

You’ll see each of the 5 FSMO roles and which domain controller holds them.

Using PowerShell to transfer FSMO roles

The 5 FSMO roles are numbered 0-4:

0 – PDCEmulator
1 – RIDMaster
2 – InfrastructureMaster
3 – SchemaMaster
4 – DomainNamingMaster

Why do we care what those numbers are? Because we can move the FSMO roles very quickly and save a lot of typing.

For example, which PowerShell command is easier to type?

Move-ADDirectoryServerOperationMasterRole -Identity “Target-DC” -OperationMasterRole SchemaMaster,RIDMaster,InfrastructureMaster,DomainNamingMaster,PDCEmulator

Or this one?

Move-ADDirectoryServerOperationMasterRole -Identity "Target-DC" -OperationMasterRole 0,1,2,3,4

Personally, if you’re moving all the roles at once to the same DC (like when doing some server maintenance) the 0,1,2,3,4 is easy.

Once you type in either of those commands you are prompted with several options for confirmation.

Y, A, N, L, S or ?

Moving FSMO roles with PowerShell

OPTIONS:

If you choose “Y” for Yes, PowerShell will prompt you to move each role,
then move to the next role, like this.

PowerShell FSMO role transfer - individual confirmation

If you choose “N” for No, PowerShell will skip transferring that role.

If you choose “A” for All, PowerShell will try to transfer all 5 roles to Target-DC.

If the transfer of a FSMO role fails PowerShell will let you know loud and clear.

PowerShell FSMO role transfer message

CONFIRMATION:

Unfortunately, if the transfer is successful you basically don’t get any confirmation of the role transfer.

You’ll need to run NETDOM QUERY FSMO to double-check who has the roles.
NETDOM QUERY FSMO to double-check FSMO role location

Side note – Once nice thing about using PowerShell to transfer the FSMO roles is that you can script the transfer to run at a scheduled time (so you don’t forget to put the roles back where they should be later).

Also, I didn’t have to load the Active Directory PowerShell module – Windows Server 2012 does that for me automatically.

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 9.4/10 (84 votes cast)

Download – Capacity Planner for Hyper-V Replica

Title: Hyper-V Replica Capacity Planner
Author: Microsoft Virtualization Team
Publisher: Microsoft Corporation
Published: 5/21/2013
File #1: Capacity Planner for Hyper-V Replica.docx
File size: 263 KB
Pages: 12
File #2: HVRCapacityPlanner.exe
File size: 437 KB
Price: FREE
Download URL: Click here to download

Description:
When considering deploying Hyper-V Replica numerous questions come up:

  • How much network bandwidth is required between the primary and replica site?
  • How much storage is required on the primary and replica site?
  • What is the storage impact by enabling multiple recovery points?

Microsoft released a new tool to help you answer those questions.

Tip: READ THE DOCUMENTATION (seriously – it’s only 12 pages).

Screenshot:

image

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Everything You Wanted to Know About Hyper-V Replica

Hyper-VWe had a fun demo of how to configure and use Hyper-V Replica in Windows Server 2012 using two HP MicroServers at the KYSBSUG meeting on Thursday May 9, 2013. Hyper-V replica truly is one of the killer features of Windows Server 2012.

Below are the links we discussed at the KYSBSUG meeting along with some extra URLs from my Hyper-V Replica research.

Tip: If you’re completely green to Hyper-V Replica, check out out the VIR302 video below from TechEd 2012.

Bottom line – this list is pretty much anything you could ever want to know about Hyper-V Replica in Windows Server 2012:

Update 2013-05-10: Added 11 more Hyper-V Replica resources

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 10.0/10 (3 votes cast)

KYSBSUG May 2013 Meeting – Hyper-V Replica

The votes are in, and the topic has been decided by you.
Mark your calendars for this week

Date: Thu May 9, 2013
Time: 6:30 PM Eastern – 8:30 PM Eastern
Venue: Money Concepts
Address: 323 Townepark Circle, Louisville, KY 40243

Topic: Hyper-V Replica in Windows Server 2012
Presenter: Tim Barrett

Description: This month we’ll show how to setup Hyper-V Replica in Windows Server 2012 and we’ll show Hyper-V replica in action.

Registration: Registration for this event is NOT required.

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

Brand Failures: Analyzing What Went Wrong

No brand is immune to failure, no matter how successful or renowned that’s why you need services from Themarketingheaven.com. While strong brands carefully cultivate their image, positioning, and customer loyalty, even the biggest names have made missteps that damaged their reputation or, in some cases, led to their downfall. Analyzing these brand failures offers valuable lessons in the importance of understanding market trends, customer needs, and maintaining brand integrity. Let’s look at some notable brand failures, exploring what went wrong and how similar pitfalls can be avoided.
1. Kodak: Failing to Embrace Digital Transformation

Kodak was once synonymous with photography, holding a dominant market position throughout the 20th century. However, as digital photography emerged, Kodak’s reluctance to embrace change led to its downfall. Ironically, Kodak even invented the first digital camera but feared that digital photography would undermine its film business, so the company failed to capitalize on it.
What Went Wrong:

Resistance to Change: Kodak held onto its legacy products instead of investing in digital technology, believing that film would continue to drive profits.
Ignoring Market Shifts: As consumers quickly transitioned to digital cameras and later smartphones, Kodak lost relevance.
Missed Opportunities: By not leveraging its digital camera technology, Kodak missed out on the burgeoning digital market.

Lesson: Brands must adapt to market shifts and technological advancements to remain relevant. Embracing innovation—even at the risk of disrupting core products—is often essential for long-term success.
2. New Coke: Misreading Customer Loyalty

In the 1980s, Coca-Cola made a bold move by launching “New Coke” in response to competition from Pepsi. The new formula was intended to revitalize the brand and win over a younger audience. However, it led to massive backlash, as loyal customers felt alienated, and Coca-Cola had to bring back its original formula under “Coca-Cola Classic.”
What Went Wrong:

Ignoring Brand Loyalty: Coca-Cola underestimated the emotional connection customers had with the original formula.
Inadequate Market Research: While focus groups indicated some preference for the new formula, Coca-Cola failed to account for the backlash that would come from changing a beloved product.
Overestimating the Need for Change: Coca-Cola assumed it needed a drastic change to compete, but customers were actually satisfied with the original product.

Lesson: Before making drastic changes, brands need to understand customer loyalty and sentiment. Change isn’t always necessary, and when it is, gradual adjustments can be better than radical overhauls.
3. Blockbuster: Underestimating the Streaming Revolution

Blockbuster dominated the video rental market for decades but was slow to adapt to the shift to online streaming. Netflix, once a small DVD-by-mail service, quickly seized the opportunity to transition to digital streaming, while Blockbuster dismissed it as a niche trend. By the time Blockbuster attempted to pivot, it was too late.
What Went Wrong:

Dismissal of Emerging Competitors: Blockbuster didn’t view Netflix as a serious competitor and failed to recognize the convenience and appeal of streaming.
Slow Digital Adoption: Blockbuster’s late attempt to transition to streaming was a half-hearted effort that couldn’t compete with Netflix’s established digital infrastructure.
Over-Reliance on Legacy Model: Blockbuster remained attached to its retail store model, not realizing the extent of the digital shift until it was too late.

Lesson: Brands must stay agile and proactive in recognizing disruptive technologies and competitors. Ignoring innovation can lead to obsolescence.
4. Pepsi’s Kendall Jenner Ad: Misjudging Social Sensitivities

Pepsi’s 2017 ad featuring Kendall Jenner attempted to tap into social justice themes by depicting a protest where a can of Pepsi seemingly resolves tensions. However, the ad was criticized for trivializing serious social issues, leading to a PR disaster and swift removal of the campaign.
What Went Wrong:

Tone-Deaf Messaging: The ad oversimplified complex social issues, creating the perception that Pepsi was out of touch with the reality of social justice movements.
Lack of Authenticity: The campaign came across as insincere, using activism as a marketing ploy rather than engaging meaningfully with the issues.
Insufficient Audience Research: The brand failed to gauge how the ad’s message would resonate with its audience, underestimating the sensitivity of social issues.

Lesson: Brands need to be careful when addressing social issues, ensuring that campaigns are authentic and respectful. Missteps in this area can lead to backlash and damage brand trust.
5. J.C. Penney: Misguided Rebranding and Pricing Strategy

In an effort to revitalize the brand, J.C. Penney hired Apple executive Ron Johnson, who introduced a new pricing strategy, moving away from discounts to a “fair and square” pricing model. However, customers were accustomed to frequent sales, and the abrupt shift caused confusion and alienated loyal shoppers.
What Went Wrong:

Misunderstanding the Customer Base: J.C. Penney’s customers valued sales and discounts, and the brand’s pivot away from this model failed to appeal to its core audience.
Failure to Test Changes Gradually: Johnson implemented sweeping changes without testing them in smaller markets, which led to a rapid and negative response.
Alienating Loyal Customers: The new strategy alienated loyal customers while failing to attract new ones, resulting in declining sales and negative publicity.

Lesson: Knowing your customer base is crucial when considering major changes. Testing new strategies incrementally can also help mitigate risks and assess customer response.
6. Google Glass: Innovation without a Clear Market

Google Glass, launched in 2013, was an innovative attempt to bring wearable tech to mainstream consumers. However, privacy concerns, a high price point, and limited practical applications led to low adoption rates and ultimately, the product’s failure.
What Went Wrong:

Lack of Market Readiness: The product was ahead of its time, and consumers weren’t ready to adopt wearable tech with such intrusive features.
High Price Point: The price was prohibitively high, limiting the device’s accessibility and appeal to a broader audience.
Privacy Concerns: The device’s ability to discreetly record others led to public backlash and privacy concerns, making people uncomfortable with its use.

Lesson: Launching innovative products requires careful consideration of market readiness, pricing, and consumer sentiment. Aligning product design with consumer needs is essential for success.
Conclusion: Key Lessons from Brand Failures

Analyzing these brand failures reveals common themes and lessons that can help other brands avoid similar pitfalls.

Stay Agile and Embrace Innovation: Brands like Kodak and Blockbuster show that adapting to technological changes is critical to staying relevant. Ignoring innovation can lead to irrelevance.

Listen to Your Customers: New Coke and J.C. Penney’s failures underscore the importance of understanding and respecting customer preferences. Alienating loyal customers can have lasting repercussions.

Consider the Social Climate: Pepsi’s misstep highlights the importance of carefully addressing social issues in marketing. Brands must ensure campaigns align authentically with social values and are respectful of sensitive issues.

Understand Market Readiness: As with Google Glass, even the most innovative products need a receptive market. Properly assessing consumer needs and concerns can mean the difference between success and failure.

Adapt with Caution: Change is necessary for growth, but brands should test strategies incrementally rather than implementing drastic changes all at once.

Learning from these missteps can offer brands the insights needed to build campaigns that resonate, adopt changes that meet customer expectations, and leverage innovation without compromising brand integrity. In a fast-evolving market, remaining adaptable, customer-centric, and authentic is key to staying ahead.

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 9.8/10 (4 votes cast)